The University of Missouri recently barred the Legion of Black Collegians from naming their fall event “Welcome Black BBQ.” It insisted on changing it to “Welcome Black and Gold BBQ,” reflecting the school’s colors. This decision deeply frustrated the Black student government. They had fought for months to keep the original name, emphasizing its cultural significance.
Despite their disappointment, the group chose to move forward with the event, recognizing the potential consequences of canceling it early in the school year. They didn’t want to undermine the hard work of their members or risk significant losses for their organization. However, they made it clear that this compromise came at a heavy cost. They said it felt like a dilution of their identity and visibility on campus.
A university spokesperson explained that the name was changed to reflect an “inclusive” environment for all students. They claimed that the original name might imply exclusion. The Legion of Black Collegians has met this reasoning with skepticism and hurt. They see it as another example of marginalization and erasure of Black presence on campus.
The group highlighted its long history of advocating for Black students, dating back to its founding in 1968 in response to racist displays during a football game. They vowed to prevent future attempts to diminish their cultural events and promised to continue their fight for visibility and representation.
The event, now named “Welcome Black and Gold BBQ,” will still take place at the Gaines/Oldham Black Culture Center. It will serve as a crucial gathering for Black students to connect and find their space at the university. However, the group remains vigilant and committed to ensuring that nobody erases their voices and cultural significance in the future.
What do you think about institutional decisions that diminish Black cultural identity? How can universities genuinely support the visibility and representation of underrepresented groups on campus?
